We have carefully selected a set of 10-min-averaged periods between February
1998 through December 2000 to study the relationship between the solar wind
and IMF conditions and
. The periods were chosen such that (1) the
solar wind and IMF conditions at the ACE spacecraft were quasi-stable for
40 min and (2) the coverage of SuperDARN backscatter was adequate to
determine
. To satisfy the stability criteria it was decided that the
effective interplanetary electric field
could not vary by more
than 7% for the
40 min period, making the calculation of the transit
time from ACE to the ionosphere less critical. Suitable ionospheric coverage
is defined as those times when >200 SuperDARN data points exist in the
dayside sector (0600-1800 MLT) or >400 data points exist anywhere in the
high-latitude region. A total of 9464 10-minute-averaged periods were found
to satisfy the first criteria, and a subset of 2721 10-minute periods satisfied
both criteria. By dropping the first and last 10-minute period of each event,
1638 high-confidence periods remain.
The resulting solutions of
obtained by applying the APL FIT technique
to the set of 10-minute-averaged periods show that for quasi-steady solar
wind and IMF,
(1) is nonlinear in
, (2) saturates at high values
of
, and (3) is extremely variable for all values of
. These
results indicate that simple formulations involving the upstream solar wind
and IMF conditions are inadequate to describe the instantaneous
in
anything but a statistical sense. A model that includes internal processes,
such as that developed by
Hill et al., [1976] and
Siscoe et al., [2002], is necessary
to describe the relationship between the solar wind parameters,
, and
possibly other geomagnetic parameters. Further study is necessary to confirm
the fit of these models with the data in our study.
This work was supported by NSF grant ATM-[9812078] and NASA grant NAG5-[8361]. Operation of the Northern Hemisphere SuperDARN radars is supported by the national funding agencies of the U.S., Canada, the U.K., and France. We gratefully acknowledge the ACE/MAG instrument team, the ACE/SWEPAM instrument team, and the ACE Science Center for providing the ACE level 2 data.